|
Institutional Review Board FAQs
When do I need to submit a proposal to the
IRB?
All proposed research that involves (1)
intervention or interaction with human subjects, (2)
the collection of identifiable private data
on living individuals and/or (3) data analysis of
identifiable private information on living
individuals requires review and approval by the IRB prior
to the initiation of the research.
What is a Human subject?
A living individual about whom an investigator (whether
professional or student) conducting research obtains
(1) data through intervention or interaction with
the individual, or (2) identifiable private
information (45 CFR 46)
What is Research?
Research
is defined by the U.S. Department Health and Human
Services as “a systematic investigation,
including research development, testing and
evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to
generalizable knowledge.” (45 CFR 46)
When in doubt, contact the
IRB
Manager to help determine whether a
particular project is “research” as defined by the
University
of Maryland
and by federal regulations.
Please note: Research that is limited to the collection of
private information on individuals requires prior
approval. If the research is exempt, the
application must be approved by the IRB Manager or
the IRB Co-Chair before data collection begins.
If the research is non-exempt, the application must
be approved by the IRB before data collection for
exempt research begins.
When is IRB Request for Determination of
Non-Human Subject or Non-Research form required ?
The
Request for Determination of Non-Human Subject or
Non-Research Form may be used by faculty,
staff and students who are not sure whether their
activity requires IRB review. You may mail the form
to the IRB Office via campus mail or bring the form
to the IRB office which is located in 2100 Lee
Building.
Faculty and staff who submit a completed
Request for Determination of Non-Human Subject or
Non-Research Form to the IRB will receive
written documentation on whether the activity
requires IRB review.
What form(s) are needed to apply to do an
experiment involving human subjects?
The IRB Initial Application Form
(MS Word),
which is available on IRB website
Is some research exempt from review?
No, all human subjects research must be
reviewed. There is a category of research
called "exempt" which means that the IRB Manager or
an IRB Co-Chair may review and approve the
research research if it involves no more than
minimal risk to the subjects and the only
involvement of human subjects will be in one or more
of the exemption
categories.
If my sponsored project proposal uses human
subjects, how does ORAA find out that I am approved?
Once the research is approved by the IRB, the
IRB Coordinator informs ORAA if you included the
ORAA protocol number on your IRB application.
You should be aware that a sponsored program account
cannot be set up unless approval has been granted.
What is Minimal Risk?
The Federal regulation for the protection of
human subjects defines minimal risk as:
"The probability and magnitude of harm or
discomfort anticipated in the research are not
greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily
encountered in daily life or during the performance
of routing physical or psychological examinations or
tests."
For research involving prisoners, minimal risk
is defined as “the probability and magnitude of
physical or psychological harm that is normally
encountered in the daily lives, or in the routine
medical, dental, or psychological examination of
healthy persons.”
When making a decision about minimal risk of research:
1. Consider both magnitude and likelihood of risk
A more serious event may be permissible if its probability is extremely low;
Example: Airplane flight carries a risk of death, but it occurs only once in some millions of passenger miles.
2. Risks of ordinary, non-invasive diagnostic tests are OK
Examples: routine blood draws in adults, general physical exams, pen-and-paper tests, ultrasound exams(at accepted levels)
3. Minimal risk may be age- or context- dependent
Example: Blood draw may be minimal risk for someone old enough to give consent, but not for a small and needle-shy child
4. Remember that risks need not be "physical" in order to be "more than minimal"
Examples: A serious privacy risk, confidentiality risk, informational risk or risk of
embarrassment may be enough to push a study into the "greater than minimal risk" category and thus to full committee reviewspan>
What is a Consent Form?
A consent form is used to provide information
to prospective subjects to enable persons to
voluntarily decide whether or not to participate as
research subjects. A consent form usually contains
the basic elements of informed consent as identified
in and required by the Federal regulations for the
protection of human subjects (45 CFR 46). A
The University of Maryland, College Park IRB
generally requires consent forms for both exempt
research and nonexempt research. If you would
like the IRB to waive some or all of the consent
form elements in the consent form template, please
refer to the following waiver criteria.
(1) The research involves no more than minimal
risk to the subjects;
(2) The waiver or alteration will not
adversely affect the rights and welfare of the
subjects;
(3) The research could not practicably be
carried out without the waiver or alteration; and
(4) Whenever appropriate, the subjects will be
provided with additional pertinent information after
participation.
You may request a waiver of informed consent
by including responses, in your IRB application, to
the above listed waiver criteria. The consent form
document can be downloaded here
(MS Word).
Who makes up the IRB?
The IRB includes members from diverse fields
including criminal justice, education, exercise
physiology, medicine, psychology, public health, and
second language acquisition. Members are drawn
from within and outside the campus community. The
IRB typically has 15-20
members with about 25% of
those members from the community.
On what basis are proposals reviewed?
Human subjects research review is based on the
IRB criteria of approval in the Federal
regulations and the three ethical
principles in the
Belmont Report which are: (1) Respect for
Persons - to the degree that they are capable,
subjects should be given the opportunity to choose
what shall or shall not happen to them (informed
consent) and persons with diminished autonomy should
be protected; (2) Beneficence - research should be
designed to maximize benefits and minimize possible
harms to the subjects; and (3) Justice - the burdens
and benefits of research should be fairly
distributed, including the selection of research
subjects.
What is the Turnaround Time for the Review of
My Application?
The turnaround time for exempt and expedited
transactions is approximately three weeks upon
receipt of the application at the IRB office. Please
note that the amount of time for an exempt review or
an expedited review may be longer if the reviewers
request changes or clarification. The turnaround
time for Full Board reviews is at least one month as
Full Board review meetings are held once a month.
However, the turnaround time for applications
reviewed by the Full Board may be longer than one
month if the application is not submitted by the
application deadline, the meeting agenda is full
when the application is submitted, or the
application is not approved as submitted when first
reviewed by the Full Board. Please be sure to review
the quality of your application prior to submitting
to the IRB. Applications that are written well and
include all documents pertaining to the project are
typically approved in a shorter amount of time.
Why does the review process sometimes take so
long?
Generally, the three different categories of
review take different amounts of time. Research
falling into the exempt category can be approved by
the IRB Manager or the IRB Co-Chairs. Exempt
research is reviewed within approximately three
weeks upon receipt. Some non-exempt research
that does not present greater than minimal risk can
be reviewed by expedited review involving a subset
of the IRB (EXPEDITED
REVIEW CATEGORIES). Expedited
reviews generally take four weeks. Research
that presents greater than minimal risk requires
Full Board review. A full board review
involves a convened meeting by a majority of the
IRB. Full board reviews are conducted monthly.
Revisions suggested by the full board, unless they
are minor and very specific, must be brought back to
a monthly full board meeting for final approval.
Who do I contact for further information?
For further information, about the IRB review
process or the status of an IRB application please
contact the IRB Staff or email at
irb@umd.edu
For information about IRB policies (e.g.
additional protections for research involving
children, pregnant women, fetuses, neonates and
prisoners) please contact the IRB Manager, Joseph
Smith, 301-405-0678 or at jsmith@umresearch.umd.edu
What does a good advertisement look like ?
The IRB must approve all plans for advertisement (e.g poster, brochures, scripts, flyers, etc) A good advertisement should include the following information:
a) Name and contact information of investigator and research
facility/institution
b) What is being studied and purpose of the research
c) Eligibility criteria in summary form
d) Brief listing of procedures
e) Time commitment required (number of visits/total duration of each
visit/etc.)
f) Compensation/Reimbursement. Please note that monetary compensation should
not be emphasized.
Additional guidelines are:
Ads should not use catchy words like "free" or "exciting"
Ads should be clear that research participation is what is being solicited
Ads should not be misleading about the purpose of the research
The flyer below is a example of an ad that meets the basic guidelines for
IRB Approval:
|